The regulation of campaign finance
by imposing a maximum limit on campaign expenditures is not a new measure. It
has been in place since the Batasang Pambansa or the National Assembly enacted Batas Pambansa
Bilang 8813 in 1985, antedating even the 1987 Constitution. Sections 100 and 101 of the Omnibus Election
Code ("OEC") state:
"Sec. 100. Limitations upon
expenses of candidates. - No candidate shall spend for his election campaign an
aggregate amount exceeding one peso and fifty centavos (PhP 1.50) for every
voter currently registered in the constituency where he filed his candidacy:
Provided, That the expenses herein referred to shall include those incurred or
caused to be incurred by the candidate, whether in cash or in kind, including
the use, rental or hire of land, water or aircraft, equipment, facilities,
apparatus and paraphernalia used in the campaign: Provided, further, That where
the land, water or aircraft, equipment, facilities, apparatus and paraphernalia
used is owned by the candidate, his contributor or supporter, the Commission is
hereby empowered to assess the amount commensurate with the expenses for the use
thereof, based on the prevailing rates in the locality and shall be included in
the total expenses incurred by the candidate.
Sec. 101. Limitations upon expenses
of political parties. - A duly accredited political party may spend for the
election of its candidates in the constituency or constituencies where it has
official candidates an aggregate amount not exceeding the equivalent of one
peso and fifty centavos (PhP 1.50) for every voter currently registered
therein. Expenses incurred by branches, chapters, or committees of such
political party shall be included in the computation of the total expenditures
of the political party.
Expenses incurred by other political
parties shall be considered as expenses of their respective individual
candidates and subject to limitation under Section 100 of this Code."
Although the allowable amount of PhP
1.50 per registered voter in the original OEC provision has already been
amended by Section 13 of Republic Act No. 7166 ("RA 7166"), enacted in 1991. Section 13 of RA
7166 reads:
"Sec. 13. Authorized Expenses
of Candidates and Political Parties. - The agreement amount that a candidate or
registered political party may spend for election campaign shall be as follows:
1.
For candidates. - Ten pesos (P10.00)
for President and Vice-President; and for other candidates Three Pesos (P3.00)
for every voter currently registered in the constituency where he filed his
certificate of candidacy: Provided, That a candidate without any political
party and without support from any political party may be allowed to spend Five
Pesos (P5.00) for every such voter; and
2.
For political parties. - Five pesos
(P5.00) for every voter currently registered in the constituency or
constituencies where it has official candidates.
Any provision of law to the contrary
notwithstanding any contribution in cash or in kind to any candidate or
political party or coalition of parties for campaign purposes, duly reported to
the Commission shall not be subject to the payment of any gift tax."
How to compute for the expenditure limit:
Example given: Candidate for
Governor, Vice Governor of Laguna affiliated with or has the support of a
political party:
Number of registered voters for
the whole Province of Laguna
|
x
|
Authorized expense per voter
registered in the constituency
|
=
|
Total amount of spending allowed
for election campaign
|
1,525,522 registered voters in
Laguna4
|
x
|
Php 3.00 per voter
|
=
|
PhP 4,576,566.00
|
For a political party, the rate is
Five Pesos (PhP 5.00) per voter within their constituency. Political parties,
upon the filing of their petition for registration with the Commission, will
have specified their constituency - whether local (limited to a city or
municipality), provincial, regional or national. The computation of their
expenditure limit will depend on their alleged constituency. Party-list
organizations will always have a national constituency base since they are
voted upon by all registered voters, even if their constituency is limited to the
interests of a sector of society (e.g. women, youth, fisherfolk, farmers,
Bicolanos, senior citizens, veterans, etc.).
In the determination of whether a
candidate or party has exceeded their allowable expenditure limit, not all
expenses incurred by them during the course of their campaign should be
included in the assessment. Section 102 of the
OEC lists the different purposes for
which a candidate or party can incur an expense during the campaign:
"Sec. 102. Lawful expenditures.
- To carry out the objectives of the preceding sections, no candidate or
treasurer of a political party shall, directly or indirectly, make any
expenditure except for the following purposes:
a.
For travelling expenses of the
candidates and campaign personnel in the course of the campaign and for
personal expenses incident thereto;
b.
For compensation of campaigners,
clerks, stenographers, messengers, and other persons actually employed in the
campaign;
c.
For telegraph and telephone tolls,
postage, freight and express delivery charges;
d.
For stationery, printing and
distribution of printed matters relative to candidacy;
e.
For employment of watchers at the
polls;
f.
For rent, maintenance and furnishing
of campaign headquarters, office or place of meetings;
g.
For political meetings and rallies
and the use of sound systems, lights and decorations during said meetings and
rallies;
h.
For newspaper, radio, television and
other public advertisements;
i.
For employment of counsel, the cost
of which shall not be taken into account in determining the amount of expenses
which a candidate or political party may have incurred under Section 100 and 101 hereof;
j.
For copying and classifying list of
voters, investigating and challenging the right to vote of persons registered
in the lists the costs of which shall not be taken into account in determining
the amount of expenses which a candidate or political party may have incurred
under Sections 100 and 101 hereof; or
k.
For printing sample ballots in such
color, size and maximum number as may be authorized by the Commission and the
cost of such printing shall not be taken into account in determining the amount
of expenses which a candidate or political party may have incurred under
Sections 100 and 101 hereof."
Note that subsections (i), (j) and
(k) all contain the phrase "shall not be taken into account in determining
the amount of expenses which a candidate or political party may have incurred
under Sections 100 and 101 hereof" - which means that expenses made to hire
lawyers, to secure a copy of the voters' lists, to file petitions for exclusion
of voters from the list, to print sample ballots - should not be included in
the computation. This is why there is a Summary Report of Lawful Expenditures
required (also known as Annex H-1 of
Resolution No. 9476) to filed by candidates and parties who participated in the
13 May 2013 National and Local Elections.
4 Minute Resolution No. 13-0133 dated 24 January 2013; EBAD
Report on Total Number of Established Precincts, Cluster/Grouped Precincts,
Total Number of Registered Voters and Voting Centers for the May 13, 2013
National and Local Elections.
No comments:
Post a Comment